• Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Blacksonrise.com
DONATE
  • Consultation EST
  • Herbs
  • Group Training
  • Videos
  • Spiritual Detox
  • Ecourses
  • Client Area
    • Course Login
    • Video Login
    • LogOut
No Result
View All Result
  • Consultation EST
  • Herbs
  • Group Training
  • Videos
  • Spiritual Detox
  • Ecourses
  • Client Area
    • Course Login
    • Video Login
    • LogOut
No Result
View All Result
Blacksonrise.com
No Result
View All Result

BHP sought to disturb cultural sites even after concerns raised: inquiry

blacksonrise by blacksonrise
September 17, 2020
in Uncategorized
0
Breaking the mold: Sculptors seek to create Black figures in bronze
0
SHARES
166
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

MELBOURNE (Reuters) – BHP Group BHP.AX pursued permission to damage Aboriginal cultural sites in April, an Australian parliamentary inquiry heard on Thursday, despite being told of the distress it would cause traditional owners.

FILE PHOTO: A miner holds a lump of iron ore at a mine located in the Pilbara region of Western Australia December 2, 2013. REUTERS/David Gray/File Photo

The inquiry is investigating Rio Tinto’s RIO.AX legal detonation in May of sacred and historically significant rockshelters for an iron ore mine at Juukan Gorge in Western Australia’s Pilbara region.

Rio’s Chief Executive Officer Jean-Sebastien Jacques and two deputies stepped down last week following a public outcry, the deep upset of the traditional owners and the discontent from institutional investors who called for management to better account for the damage.

BHP executives David Bunting, the company’s Australian Heritage Manager, and Libby Ferrari, Head of Indigenous Engagement, testified about the company’s application to disturb 40 sacred sites of the Banjima indigenous group as part of its $2.9 billion South Flank mine expansion in the Pilbara.

The Banjima “did provide feedback through BHP that there were concerns around some of the places” that would be disturbed, said Ferrari. “They were able to and did air their views quite clearly with us and with the regulator.”

Both Ferrari and Bunting noted that the Banjima did not object to the South Flank expansion, but also acknowledged that the consent agreement between BHP and the Banjima does not allow them to legally object to the destruction of sacred sites.

However, an April 16, 2020, letter from Banjima Native Title Aboriginal Corporation Chief Executive Officer Joanna Ramsey submitted as part of BHP’s application contains heartfelt objections to their destruction.

Advertisements

In the letter reviewed by Reuters, Banjima Corporation Chairman Maitland Parker says, “that while he knows Banjima cannot object to the application, this in no way diminishes the cumulative loss that Banjima people feel each and every time significant places … are to be harmed.”

Parker added that he wanted future generations to “know we didn’t just sign off on this stuff and forget about it, we put up a fight about these places.”

The Western Australia Minister for Aboriginal Affairs approved BHP’s application on May 29, just days after the news that Rio destroyed the Juukan Gorge sites.

Of more than 480 applications by miners to disturb significant sites in the past 10 years to July, all but one have been approved.

In her testimony on Thursday, Ferrari said that BHP was working under the consents that are currently in place.

“Would we have done things differently in hindsight? Possibly.”

BHP pledged on June 11 not to disturb any of the Banjima sites without further study and consultation.

Edgar Basto, the head of BHP’s Australian operations, said the miner is focusing on improving its approach to better protect heritage sites in a process of deep engagement with traditional owners.

BHP said last week it would set up a heritage committee with senior Banjima elders to improve consultation and communication around heritage sites.

BHP has also clarified that Aboriginal owners are free to comment on the management of their cultural heritage, and is reviewing clauses around consent in its agreements.

However, BHP, like Rio and Fortescue Metals Group FMG.AX have stopped short of supporting the right of Aboriginal groups to veto the destruction of sacred sites.

Reporting by Melanie Burton; Editing by Christian Schmollinger

Credit: Source link

Previous Post

Deadly Diva Day turns full circle for new facilitator

Next Post

What It’s Like To Be Held By ICE During The COVID-19 Pandemic

Next Post
What It’s Like To Be Held By ICE During The COVID-19 Pandemic

What It’s Like To Be Held By ICE During The COVID-19 Pandemic

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ADVERTISEMENT

HOT Updates

No Content Available

BlackSonRise.com is an online news portal which aims to provide Caribbean News, African News, Business and much more stuff like that. Feel free to get in touch with us!

Follow us on social media:

Recent News

  • Eyewitness: Christmas Eve… | INews Guyana
  • UK stocks edge higher in muted holiday trading – SABC News
  • History repeats for NYCFC against Costa Rican debutant

Subscribe NOW

Loading
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

© 2019 Blacksonrise.com is an online news, e-learning, and business website that caters to the global black community.

No Result
View All Result
  • Consultation EST
  • Herbs
  • Group Training
  • Videos
  • Spiritual Detox
  • Ecourses
  • Client Area
    • Course Login
    • Video Login
    • LogOut

© 2019 Blacksonrise.com is an online news, e-learning, and business website that caters to the global black community.

USD $
  • USD USD $
  • EUR EUR €
  • GBP GBP £